Fuzzy investment portfolio selection models based on interval analysis approach

14Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper employs fuzzy set theory to solve the unintuitive problem of the Markowitz mean-variance (MV) portfolio model and extend it to a fuzzy investment portfolio selection model. Our model establishes intervals for expected returns and risk preference, which can take into account investors' different investment appetite and thus can find the optimal resolution for each interval. In the empirical part, we test this model in Chinese stocks investment and find that this model can fulfill different kinds of investors' objectives. Finally, investment risk can be decreased when we add investment limit to each stock in the portfolio, which indicates our model is useful in practice. © 2012 Haifeng Guo et al.

References Powered by Scopus

PORTFOLIO SELECTION

16835Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A novel approach to filter design for T-S fuzzy discrete-time systems with time-varying delay

393Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A novel control design on discrete-time takagi-sugeno fuzzy systems with time-varying delays

344Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A MULTI-OBJECTIVE APPROACH BASED ON MARKOWITZ AND DEA CROSS-EFFICIENCY MODELS FOR THE INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY PORTFOLIO SELECTION PROBLEM

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review of fuzzy investment research considering modelling environment and element fusion

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On application oriented fuzzy numbers for imprecise investment recommendations

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guo, H., Sun, B., Karimi, H. R., Ge, Y., & Jin, W. (2012). Fuzzy investment portfolio selection models based on interval analysis approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/628295

Readers over time

‘18‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 2

33%

Arts and Humanities 2

33%

Mathematics 1

17%

Engineering 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0