Management outcome and the role of manipulation in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

12Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine and compare treatment outcomes for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). METHODS: 24 patients with acute or acute-on-chronic SCFE underwent preoperative traction, 13 of them followed by in situ screw fixation (group A), and the remaining 11, manipulation with screw fixation (group B). Their treatment outcomes (according to the Aadalen criteria) and complications were compared. RESULTS: There were 2 treatment failures and one poor outcome in patients with acute SCFE (2 had avascular necrosis and one had slight pain with mild limitation of hip movement). The risk of developing avascular necrosis was significantly higher in patients with acute rather than acute-on-chronic or chronic slips. No significant differences were evident between groups A and B with regard to age, sex, ethnicity, outcomes, and preoperative and postoperative changes in the Southwick headshaft angle. CONCLUSION: Patients with acute or acute-on-chronic SCFE can be safely managed with straight-leg traction for up to 6 days, followed by in situ screw fixation without manipulation. Manipulation is not recommended in such slips, due to a higher avascular necrosis risk.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lim, Y. J., Lam, K. S., Lim, K. B., Mahadev, A., & Lee, E. H. (2007). Management outcome and the role of manipulation in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong), 15(3), 334–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900701500319

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free