Evaluation of three barrier-type closed system transfer devices using the 2015 NIOSH vapor containment performance draft protocol

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Closed System Transfer Devices (CSTD) have been developed to reduce healthcare worker exposure to hazardous drugs during medication handling. To evaluate CSTD performance in preventing the escape of drug vapors, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) developed a 2015 draft testing protocol incorporating two compounding tasks utilizing 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) as a medication surrogate. Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of three CSTDs (Chemolock [ICU Medical Inc., San Clemente, CA], PhaSeal [BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ], and Equashield [Equashield, Port Washington, NY]) in preventing the escape of drug vapor in accordance with the 2015 NIOSH draft protocol during simulated compounding and administration tasks. Methods: The protocol was modified for the CSTDs to be used in accordance with manufacturer instructions for use and to represent clinical practice through repeated CSTD connections. Tasks were executed with each of the three CSTDs using 70% IPA as the medication surrogate to simulate compounding of a lyophilized drug, intravenous (IV) bag preparation (task 1), and bolus administration through an IV set (task 2). A positive control was performed by completing both tasks in duplicate, utilizing a needle and syringe instead of the CSTD to simulate preparation and injection through luer connectors. Differences in time to complete each simulated task was also evaluated. Results: The three CSTDs had statistically equivalent performance and maintained IPA vapor levels below the limit of detection (LOD) of 1.0 ppm. Positive controls had mean vapor release of 17.40 ppm and 23.45 ppm for tasks 1 and 2, respectively. Positive controls also required statistically longer mean time to complete both tasks, followed in decreasing order by PhaSeal, Equashield, and Chemolock. Conclusions: This study suggests that when evaluated in accordance with the 2015 NIOSH draft protocol, the three CSTDs are equivalent in their ability to prevent IPA vapor release while differences in time required for task completion may exist.

References Powered by Scopus

ASHP guidelines on handling hazardous drugs

0
256Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Leukaemia and reproductive outcome among nurses handling antineoplastic drugs

207Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preventing occupational exposures to antineoplastic drugs in health care settings

200Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evaluation of propylene glycol methyl ether as a potential challenge agent for leak detection of liquid and headspace from closed system drug transfer devices using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessment of environmental viral contamination of liquids prepared in a closed system drug transfer device

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An assessment of seven closed system transfer devices in accordance with the 2015 NIOSH vapor containment performance protocol

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szkiladz, A., & Hegner, S. (2022). Evaluation of three barrier-type closed system transfer devices using the 2015 NIOSH vapor containment performance draft protocol. Drugs and Therapy Perspectives, 38(4), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-022-00905-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free