Demanding equal rights and treatment of husbands/partners in paternity disputes: A South African perspective

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The legitimacy presumption poses a threat to the equality of parties in a marriage/partnership in today's constitutional society. The approach adopted by courts in paternity disputes reveals an ongoing inequality in marriages/partnerships. The marriage/partnership is being used by courts to prevent a husband/partner from introducing a paternity claim on the assumption that doing so is not in the best interests of the child. Courts should be cautious in using children as a mechanism for preventing a husband/partner from determining their biological relationship. The child's best interests can only be advanced if children know his biological identity. Husband/partner must have the right to know their biological relationship to their wives/partner's children. A husbands/partners' right to assert his paternity claims, on a balance of probabilities and on an equal basis is an inherent right to dignity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mmusinyane, B. (2016). Demanding equal rights and treatment of husbands/partners in paternity disputes: A South African perspective. African Journal of Legal Studies. Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-12340009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free