Adolescent bullying, relationships, psychological well-being, and gender-atypical behavior: A gender diagnosticity approach

165Citations
Citations of this article
168Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this study we used a gender diagnostic (GD) approach to examine the associations between gender-atypical behavior and gender role (masculinity-M and femininity-F), bullying, peer relationships, and psychological well-being in a large community sample of 15-year-olds. GD showed little relationship with gender role. Irrespective of sex, M was positively, and F negatively associated with being a bully. "Gender atypical" boys reported more victimization, more loneliness, fewer male friends, and greater distress than their "gender typical" peers. After accounting for M and F, "femaleness" ("gender atypical" boys and "extremely gender-typed" girls) was associated with psychological distress. GD is an effective and unobtrusive method to identify a group whose vulnerability should be recognized by psychology, health, and education professionals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Young, R., & Sweeting, H. (2004). Adolescent bullying, relationships, psychological well-being, and gender-atypical behavior: A gender diagnosticity approach. Sex Roles, 50(7–8), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sers.0000023072.53886.86

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free