Development and Testing of a Scale to Assess Physician Attitudes about Handheld Computers with Decision Support

9Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The authors developed and evaluated a rating scale, the Attitudes toward Handheld Decision Support Software Scale (H-DSS), to assess physician attitudes about handheld decision support systems. Design: The authors conducted a prospective assessment of psychometric characteristics of the H-DSS including reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Participants were 82 Internal Medicine residents. A higher score on each of the 14 five-point Likert scale items reflected a more positive attitude about handheld DSS. The H-DSS score is the mean across the fourteen items. Attitudes toward the use of the handheld DSS were assessed prior to and six months after receiving the handheld device. Statistics: Cronbach's Alpha was used to assess internal consistency reliability. Pearson correlations were used to estimate and detect significant associations between scale scores and other measures (validity). Paired sample t-tests were used to test for changes in the mean attitude scale score (responsiveness) and for differences between groups. Results: Internal consistency reliability for the scale was α = 0.73. In testing validity, moderate correlations were noted between the attitude scale scores and self-reported Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) usage in the hospital (correlation coefficient = 0.55) and clinic (0.48), p < 0.05 for both. The scale was responsive, in that it detected the expected increase in scores between the two administrations (3.99 (s.d. = 0.35) vs. 4.08, (s.d. = 0.34), p < 0.005). Conclusion: The authors' evaluation showed that the H-DSS scale was reliable, valid, and responsive. The scale can be used to guide future handheld DSS development and implementation. © 2006 J Am Med Inform Assoc.

References Powered by Scopus

User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view

27555Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: A systematic review

2451Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria

2048Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Using survey questions to identify and learn more about those who exhibit design thinking traits

58Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mobile apps

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An assessment of health care information and management systems society and Leapfrog data on computerized provider order entry

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ray, M. N., Houston, T. K., Yu, F. B., Menachemi, N., Maisiak, R. S., Allison, J. J., & Berner, E. S. (2006). Development and Testing of a Scale to Assess Physician Attitudes about Handheld Computers with Decision Support. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(5), 567–572. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2096

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

41%

Researcher 11

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

55%

Computer Science 10

30%

Social Sciences 3

9%

Engineering 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0