We propose LLM-EVAL, a unified multidimensional automatic evaluation method for open-domain conversations with large language models (LLMs). Existing evaluation methods often rely on human annotations, ground-truth responses, or multiple LLM prompts, which can be expensive and time-consuming. To address these issues, we design a single prompt-based evaluation method that leverages a unified evaluation schema to cover multiple dimensions of conversation quality in a single model call. We extensively evaluate the performance of LLM-EVAL on various benchmark datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness, efficiency, and adaptability compared to state-of-the-art evaluation methods. Our analysis also highlights the importance of choosing suitable LLMs and decoding strategies for accurate evaluation results. LLM-EVAL offers a versatile and robust solution for evaluating open-domain conversation systems, streamlining the evaluation process and providing consistent performance across diverse scenarios.
CITATION STYLE
Lin, Y. T., & Chen, Y. N. (2023). LLM-EVAL: Unified Multi-Dimensional Automatic Evaluation for Open-Domain Conversations with Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 47–58). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.nlp4convai-1.5
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.