Why do some traits show higher fluctuating asymmetry than others? A test of hypotheses with tail feathers of birds

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Certain characters are more susceptible to increased fluctuating asymmetry (FA) than others. This trait-specific susceptibility has normally been attributed to different degrees of developmental stability, which could be caused by different modes of selection, functionality, or the stress experienced during the development process. Recently, it has also been suggested that the expression of FA not only depends on developmental stability, but also on the cost of growth of the trait, defined as the amount of structural components necessary to form a unit of length of a given character. In accordance with this argument, a trait with more structural components per unit of length should show lower asymmetry than a simpler one. To test this hypothesis, we examine the structure (number of barbs, barb length, and rachis width) and asymmetry of the longest tail feathers in 26 bird species. Regression analyses using phylogenetically independent contrasts show that FA is negatively correlated with the number of barbs and feather rachis width in males (including species with elongated tails subjected to sexual selection), and with rachis width in females, whose tails supposedly evolve by natural selection. Moreover, the negative correlation between FA and rachis width persisted when taking only the males of non-dimorphic species. These results confirm the hypothesis, suggesting that a trait's susceptibility to express developmental instability by fluctuating asymmetry depends on its structural composition.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aparicio, J. M., & Bonal, R. (2002). Why do some traits show higher fluctuating asymmetry than others? A test of hypotheses with tail feathers of birds. Heredity, 89(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800118

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

42%

Researcher 20

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41

75%

Environmental Science 8

15%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

7%

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free