Evaluating Tracking Accuracy of an Automatic Reading Tutor

7Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In automatic reading tutoring, tracking is the process of automatically following a reader through a given target text. When developing tracking algorithms, a measure of the tracking accuracy – how often a spoken word is aligned to the right target text word position – is needed in order to evaluate performance and compare different algorithms. This paper presents a framework for determining the observed tracking error rate. The proposed framework is used to evaluate three tracking strategies: A) follow the reader to whichever word he/she jumps to in the text, B) follow the reader monotonically from left to right ignoring word skips and regressions (going back to a previous text word), and C) the same as B but allowing isolated word skips. Observed tracking error rate for each of the three tracking strategies is: A: 53%, B: 56%, and C: 47%, on 1883 utterances from 25 children.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rasmussen, M. H., Mostow, J., Tan, Z. H., Lindberg, B., & Li, Y. (2011). Evaluating Tracking Accuracy of an Automatic Reading Tutor. In Speech and Language Technology in Education, SLaTE 2011 (pp. 17–20). The International Society for Computers and Their Applications (ISCA). https://doi.org/10.21437/slate.2011-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free