Factors contributing to radiation dose for patients and operators during diagnostic cardiac angiography

19Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnostic coronary angiography (CA) uses ionising radiation with relatively high doses, which impact on both patients and staff. This study sought to identify which patient and procedural factors impact patient and operator dose the most during CA. Methods: Patient and procedure related variables impacting on Kerma area product (P KA ) and operator dose (OD) were collected for 16 months. Procedures were separated into 10 different procedure categories. P KA was used for patient dose and OD was measured with an instantly downloadable dosimeter (IDD) – downloaded at the end of each procedure. High and low radiation dose was defined by binary variables based on the 75th percentile of the continuous measures. Univariate and multivariate regression were used to identify predictors. Results: Of 3860 patients included, the IDD was worn for 2591 (61.7%). Obesity (BMI > 30 compared to BMI < 25) was the strongest predictor for both a P KA (odds ratio (OR) = 19.1 (95% CI 13.5–26.9) P < 0.001) and OD (OR = 3.3 (2.4–4.4) P < 0.001) above the 75th percentile. Male gender, biplane imaging, the X-ray unit used, operator experience and procedure type also predicted a high P KA . Radial access, male gender, biplane imaging and procedure type also predicted a high OD. Conclusion: Radiation dose during CA is multifactorial and is dependent on patient and procedure related variables. Many factors impact on both P KA and OD but obesity is the strongest predictor for both patients and operators to receive a high radiation dose.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crowhurst, J. A., Whitby, M., Savage, M., Murdoch, D., Robinson, B., Shaw, E., … Walters, D. L. (2019). Factors contributing to radiation dose for patients and operators during diagnostic cardiac angiography. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 66(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.315

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free