Does the goal justify the methods? Harm and benefit in neuroscience research using animals

11Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The goal of the present chapter is to open up for discussion some of the major ethical issues involved in animal-based neuroscience research. We begin by approaching the question of the moral acceptability of the use of animals in research at all, exploring the implications of three different ethical theories: contractarianism, utilitarianism, and animal rights. In the rest of this chapter, we discuss more specific issues of neuroscience research within what we argue is the mainstream framework for research animal ethics, namely one based on harm– benefit analysis. We explore issues of harms and benefits and how to balance them as well as how to reduce harm and increase benefit within neuroscience research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Castro, A. C. V., & Olsson, I. A. S. (2015). Does the goal justify the methods? Harm and benefit in neuroscience research using animals. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, 19, 47–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2014_319

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free