Intercontinental transport and deposition patterns of atmospheric mercury from anthropogenic emissions

39Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Global policies that regulate anthropogenic mercury emissions to the environment require quantitative and comprehensive source-receptor relationships for mercury emissions, transport and deposition among major continental regions. In this study, we use the GEOS-Chem global chemical transport model to establish source-receptor relationships among 11 major continental regions worldwide. Source-receptor relationships for surface mercury concentrations (SMC) show that some regions (e.g., East Asia, the Indian subcontinent, and Europe) should be responsible for their local surface Hg(II) and Hg(P) concentrations due to near-field transport and deposition contributions from their local anthropogenic emissions (up to 64 and 71% for Hg(II) and Hg(P), respectively, over East Asia). We define the region of primary influence (RPI) and the region of secondary influence (RSI) to establish intercontinental influence patterns. Results indicate that East Asia is the SMC RPI for almost all other regions, while Europe, Russia, and the Indian subcontinent also make some contributions to SMC over some receptor regions because they are dominant RSI source regions. Source-receptor relationships for mercury deposition show that approximately 16 and 17% of dry and wet deposition, respectively, over North America originate from East Asia, indicating that transpacific transport of East Asian emissions is the major foreign source of mercury deposition in North America. Europe, Southeast Asia, and the Indian subcontinent are also important mercury deposition sources for some receptor regions because they are the dominant RSIs. We also quantify seasonal variation on mercury deposition contributions over other regions from East Asia. Results show that mercury deposition (including dry and wet) contributions from East Asia over the Northern Hemisphere receptor regions (e.g., North America, Europe, Russia, the Middle East, and Middle Asia) vary seasonally, with the maximum values in summer and minimum values in winter. The opposite seasonal pattern occurs on mercury dry deposition contributions over Southeast Asia and the Indian subcontinent.

Figures

  • Figure 1. The 11 continental regions tagged in our GEOS-Chem simulations.
  • Figure 2. Tagged regional anthropogenic mercury emissions.
  • Figure 3. Scatter plot of observed and modeled TGM concentrations under two scenarios: (a) In-plume reduction is used globally; (b) Inplume reduction is not used. The solid line indicates the 1 : 1 line, while the dashed lines correspond to±50 %. The RMSE (root-mean-square error) for each scenario is shown.
  • Figure 4. Global spatial distributions of annual average SMC and mercury deposition: (a) surface Hg(0) concentrations; (b) surface Hg(II) concentrations; (c) surface Hg(P) concentrations; (d) mercury dry deposition (Hg(0) dry deposition+Hg(II) dry deposition+Hg(P) dry deposition); (e) mercury wet deposition (Hg(II) wet deposition+Hg(P) wet deposition); (f) total mercury deposition (dry deposition+wet deposition).
  • Figure 5. Global budget of atmospheric mercury derived from this study. The fluxes in parentheses indicate uptake of Hg(II) by seasalt aerosol.
  • Table 1. Contributions from local and foreign sources to annual average A-W SMC (including Hg(0), Hg(II), Hg(P)) over each receptor region. The percent contributions (POC) that are defined using ratios of local or background to total are quantified.
  • Figure 6. Intercontinental influence patterns based on the RPI (region of primary influence) and RSI (region of secondary influence) for SMC: (a) Hg(0); (b) Hg(II); (c) Hg(P). Arrows point in the direction of influence from the RPI or RSI to a receptor region. Colors indicate the magnitude of POC contributed from the RPI or RSI to a receptor region.
  • Table 2. Contributions from local and foreign sources to dry and wet deposition over each receptor region. The categories are defined same as Table 1.

References Powered by Scopus

Mercury as a global pollutant: Sources, pathways, and effects

1940Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models

1872Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Atmospheric mercury - An overview

1598Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Measuring and modeling mercury in the atmosphere: A critical review

210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global sources and pathways of mercury in the context of human health

181Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current and future levels of mercury atmospheric pollution on a global scale

172Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, L., Wang, H. H., Liu, J. F., Tong, Y. D., Ou, L. B., Zhang, W., … Wang, X. J. (2014). Intercontinental transport and deposition patterns of atmospheric mercury from anthropogenic emissions. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14(18), 10163–10176. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10163-2014

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

61%

Researcher 5

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 11

50%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 7

32%

Chemistry 2

9%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0