Group, individual, and staff therapy: An efficient and effective cognitive behavioral therapy in long-term care

31Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective. Depression is a major problem in long-term care (LTC) as is the lack of related empirically supported psychological treatments. This small study addressed a variant of cognitive behavioral therapy, GIST (group, individual, and staff therapy), against treatment as usual (TAU) in long-term care. Method. 25 residents with depression were randomized to GIST (n = 13) or TAU (n = 12). Outcome measures included geriatric depression scale-short form (GDS-S), life satisfaction index Z (LSI-Z), and subjective ratings of treatment satisfaction. The GIST group participated in 15 group sessions. TAU crossed over to GIST at the end of the treatment trial. Results. There were significant differences between GIST and TAU in favor of GIST on the GDS-S and LSI-Z. The GIST group maintained improvements over another 14 sessions. After crossover to GIST, TAU members showed significant improvement from baseline. Participants also reported high subjective ratings of treatment satisfaction. Discussion. This trial demonstrated GIST to be more effective for depression in LTC than standard treatments. © 2009 Sage Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hyer, L., Yeager, C. A., Hilton, N., & Sacks, A. (2009). Group, individual, and staff therapy: An efficient and effective cognitive behavioral therapy in long-term care. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 23(6), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317508323571

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free