Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction

145Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials have long been important synthesis tools for guiding evidence-based medicine. More recently, network meta-analyses, an extension of traditional meta-analyses enabling the comparison of multiple interventions, use new statistical methods to incorporate clinical evidence from both direct and indirect treatment comparisons in a network of treatments and associated trials. There is a need to provide education to ensure that core methodological considerations underlying network meta-analyses are well understood by readers and researchers to maximize their ability to appropriately interpret findings and appraise validity. Network meta-analyses are highly informative for assessing the comparative effects of multiple competing interventions in clinical practice and are a valuable tool for health technology assessment and comparative effectiveness research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Catalá-López, F., Tobías, A., Cameron, C., Moher, D., & Hutton, B. (2014, November 1). Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction. Rheumatology International. Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-2994-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free