Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials have long been important synthesis tools for guiding evidence-based medicine. More recently, network meta-analyses, an extension of traditional meta-analyses enabling the comparison of multiple interventions, use new statistical methods to incorporate clinical evidence from both direct and indirect treatment comparisons in a network of treatments and associated trials. There is a need to provide education to ensure that core methodological considerations underlying network meta-analyses are well understood by readers and researchers to maximize their ability to appropriately interpret findings and appraise validity. Network meta-analyses are highly informative for assessing the comparative effects of multiple competing interventions in clinical practice and are a valuable tool for health technology assessment and comparative effectiveness research.
CITATION STYLE
Catalá-López, F., Tobías, A., Cameron, C., Moher, D., & Hutton, B. (2014, November 1). Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction. Rheumatology International. Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-2994-2
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.