Optimizing friction between alternative genomic metaphors: How much plurality is enough?

  • Larson B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction In On Metaphor, Wayne Booth argues that, "Criticism of metaphoric worlds, or visions, [represents] one clear and important-perhaps the clearest and most important-instance of a general human project of improving life by criticizing it." 2 Given the radical extent to which genomics may affect the "general human project", our aim to consider its metaphors would thus be one of the higher aims to which we can aspire. While some still underestimate the performativity of language-and metaphor, specifically-too many scholars from too many fields have drawn attention to its importance for us to ignore. 3 The metaphors we use to conceptualize genomics today will partly come to define humanity in the future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Larson, B. M. (2009). Optimizing friction between alternative genomic metaphors: How much plurality is enough? Genomics, Society and Policy, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-5354-5-3-20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free