Central or axial atlantoaxial dislocation and craniovertebral junction alterations: a review of 393 patients treated over 12 years

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The authors reviewed their scientific publications and updated their clinical material obtained over the last 12 years for cases of central or axial atlantoaxial dislocation (CAAD) identified in the presence of craniovertebral musculoskeletal and/or neural alteration(s). The management implications of diagnosing and treating CAAD are highlighted. METHODS During a 12-year period, CAAD was diagnosed in 393 patients with craniovertebral junction–related musculoskeletal and neural alterations who underwent atlantoaxial fixation. No bone decompression was done. All CAADrelated craniovertebral junction structural changes were identified to have a naturally protective role. Hence, in this paper the term “craniovertebral alterations” is used for “craniovertebral junction anomalies” and the term “Chiari formation” is used instead of the commonly used term “Chiari malformation.” RESULTS The major radiological diagnosis was determined either singly or in cohort with one or more of other socalled pathological entities that included Chiari formation (367 cases), syringomyelia with Chiari (306 cases), idiopathic syringomyelia (12 cases), type B basilar invagination (147 cases), bifid arch of the atlas (9 cases), assimilation of the atlas (119 cases), C2–3 fusion (65 cases), Klippel-Feil alteration (4 cases), and dorsal kyphoscoliosis (15 cases). The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 155 months. Clinical improvement was observed in all patients. CONCLUSIONS Understanding and treating CAAD may have significant implications in the surgical treatment of a number of clinical entities. The gratifying clinical outcomes obtained in patients after atlantoaxial fixation, without any type of decompression involving bone or soft-tissue resection, consolidate the concept that atlantoaxial instability has a defining role in the pathogenesis