Morphine: Controlled trial of different methods of administration for postoperative pain relief

110Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Forty-five patients who had undergone major operations were given a slow intravenous injection of morphine sulphate (1 mg/ml saline) until their pain was relieved and were then randomly divided into three equal groups to receive different regimens of morphine sulphate over the next 72 hours. Patients in group A received 3.5 times the pain-relieving dose (28–63 mg, mean 36 mg) by continuous intravenous infusion; those in group B received the pain-relieving dose (90–160 mg, mean 110 mg) intramuscularly, four-hourly for the first 24 hours, six-hourly for the next 24 hours, and then eight and 20 hours later; and those in group C received the pain-relieving dose (80–280 mg, mean 140 mg) intramuscularly as required. Pain was assessed on a linear analogue scale and vital capacity and peak expiratory flow rate measured 12-hourly. The mean pain score was significantly lower and respiratory function significantly better in group A than in groups B and C. Only one patient (in group A) required extra morphine. Thus morphine administered by continuous intravenous infusion is superior to other regimens, giving better pain relief at a lower dosage. © 1980, British Medical Journal Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rutter, P. C., Murphy, F., & Dudley, H. A. F. (1980). Morphine: Controlled trial of different methods of administration for postoperative pain relief. British Medical Journal, 280(6206), 12–13. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.280.6206.12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free