Perspectives of children, family caregivers, and health professionals about pediatric oncology symptoms: a systematic review

26Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the existing body of evidence to determine the current state of knowledge regarding the perspectives of the following groups: (1) children with cancer, (2) family caregivers, and (3) healthcare professionals, about symptoms, as well as factors that may influence the symptom reports. Methods: A systematic search was performed for all types of studies that included the perspectives of at least two groups of participants’ symptom reports. Children included anyone younger than 19 years of age who was diagnosed with any type of cancer. Electronic searches were conducted in five English databases and four Chinese databases. The appraisal of methodological quality was conducted using the GRADE criteria. Data were extracted into matrix tables. Results: Thirty-three studies were included. The pediatric oncology symptoms reported by children, family caregivers, and healthcare professionals were synthesized. Findings suggested that family caregivers’ symptom reports were more closely aligned with children’s reports than with the healthcare professionals’ reports. Influencing factors on the different symptom reports included the children’s diagnosis, symptom characteristics, social-demographic factors, and family caregivers’ psychosocial status. Conclusions: Children with cancer should be the primary reporters for their symptoms. When there are reporters other than the children, the potential discrepancy between the different perspectives needs to be carefully considered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheng, L., Wang, L., He, M., Feng, S., Zhu, Y., & Rodgers, C. (2018, September 1). Perspectives of children, family caregivers, and health professionals about pediatric oncology symptoms: a systematic review. Supportive Care in Cancer. Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4257-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free