Duration of effectiveness of Botulinum toxin type A in excessive gingival display: a systematic review and meta-analysis

28Citations
Citations of this article
175Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Botulinum toxin type A is effective in reducing excessive gingival display caused by hyperfunctional upper lip elevator muscles; however, this effect is transient. This study aimed to determine the duration of the effectiveness of botulinum toxin type A on a gummy smile. A systematic search was conducted using Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases, from 1970 to March 2017 with no language restriction; the search included studies evaluating adult patients with excessive gingival display who were treated with botulinum toxin and were followed-up for at least 3 months. OpenGrey and Clinical Trial Registry were also consulted. Quality assessment was applied to determine the level of evidence and bias, and a meta-analysis was performed. Of 2181 full texts, 71 were obtained, with 3 prospective studies meeting the selection criteria. The gingival display was significantly reduced to baseline with 2, 4, and 8 weeks of treatment. The gingival display considerably reduced at the baseline-2-week comparison (−4.44 mm using raw data and−4.05 mm using the standard difference) and increased throughout the weeks of follow-up. There is scant evidence to determine the duration of the effectiveness of toxin type A on a gummy smile. The effect tends to be stable until at least 8 weeks of followup, and the gingival exposure may not return to baseline within 12 weeks of follow-up. Well-designed randomized clinical trials with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up are necessary to strengthen the evidence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chagas, T. F., de Almeida, N. V., Lisboa, C. O., Ferreira, D. M. T. P., Mattos, C. T., & Mucha, J. N. (2018). Duration of effectiveness of Botulinum toxin type A in excessive gingival display: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brazilian Oral Research, 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free