Enteral nutrition discontinuation and outcomes in general critically ill patients

8Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between enteral nutrition discontinuation and outcome in general critically ill patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients admitted to a mixed intensive care unit in a tertiary care hospital from May-August 2009 were screened for an indication for enteral nutrition. Patients were followed up until leaving the intensive care unit or a maximum of 28 days. The gastrointestinal failure score was calculated daily by adding values of 0 if the enteral nutrition received was identical to the nutrition prescribed, 1 if the enteral nutrition received was at least 75% of that prescribed, 2 if the enteral nutrition received was between 50-75% of that prescribed, 3 if the enteral nutrition received was between 50-25% of that prescribed, and 4 if the enteral nutrition received was less than 25% of that prescribed. RESULTS: The mean, worst, and categorical gastrointestinal failure scores were associated with lower survival in these patients. Age, categorical gastrointestinal failure score, type of admission, need for mechanical ventilation, sequential organ failure assessment, and Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores were selected for analysis with binary regression. In bothmodels, the categorical gastrointestinal failure scorewas related tomortality. CONCLUSION: The determination of the difference between prescribed and received enteral nutrition seemed to be a useful prognostic marker and is feasible to be incorporated into a gastrointestinal failure score. © 2013 CLINICS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silva, M. A., dos Santos, S. da G. F., Tomasi, C. D., da Luz, G., da Silva Paula, M. M., Dal Pizzol, F., & Ritter, C. (2013). Enteral nutrition discontinuation and outcomes in general critically ill patients. Clinics, 68(2), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(02)OA09

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free