Sensory interactions in bilateral kinesthesia

0Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Three experiments are reported that examine the masking effect on the detection of kinesthetic targets from noise presented simultaneously on the same hand or on a different hand as the target. Performance was facilitated when noise on the two hands was correlated versus uncorrelated or when it occurred on just one hand. The data are consistent with correlated input on the two hands being compared and used to reduce noise effects. Moreover, participants ignored uncorrelated noise from nontarget hands when they knew in which hand the targets would occur. There was no effect of shifts from uncorrelated to correlated noise 200 msec prior to targets, suggesting that such bottom-up changes were insufficient to induce comparison across the hands. In contrast, shifts from correlated to uncorrelated noise 200 msec prior to the target had performance at the same level as that with uncorrelated noise throughout the trial. This result indicates that the loss of correlation was detected within this interval and that when the target's location was known, participants were then able to switch attention to the target hand. The interactions between attentional filtering and the correlation on the processing of bilateral kinesthetic inputs are discussed. Copyright 2008 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition

1393Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Phase transitions and critical behavior in human bimanual coordination

1250Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the coordination of two-handed movements

488Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roberts, R. D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Sensory interactions in bilateral kinesthesia. Perception and Psychophysics, 70(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.1.65

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

58%

Researcher 3

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 4

44%

Computer Science 2

22%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

22%

Philosophy 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free