Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for tumour staging of bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

63Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for local staging of bladder cancer for four clinical scenarios (T-stage thresholds) considered against current standards for clinical staging and secondarily to identify sources for variability in accuracy. Systematic review of patients with bladder cancer undergoing T-staging MRI to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Sub-group analysis was done to explore variability; risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. The search identified 30 studies (5156 patients). Pooled accuracy at multiple T-stage thresholds: ≤T1 vs ≥T2 = sensitivity 87% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82–91), specificity 79% (95% CI 72–85); T-any vs T0 = sensitivity 65% (95% CI 23–92), specificity 90% (95% CI 83–94); ≤T2 vs ≥T3 = sensitivity 83% (95% CI 75–88), specificity 87% (95% CI 78–93); and

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gandhi, N., Krishna, S., Booth, C. M., Breau, R. H., Flood, T. A., Morgan, S. C., … McInnes, M. D. F. (2018, November 1). Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for tumour staging of bladder cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU International. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14366

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free