After the long domination of economic and collective action theories, the literature on the political aspects of Allied burden-sharing is growing. This article analyses the politics of fair-share in NATO from the perspective of Canadian officials during the first burden-sharing debates in 1949–1952. I focus on sense-making and, through an interpretive methodology, I reconstruct the Canadian discourse on fair-share. This article shows that for Canada sharing NATO’s burden was not only a matter of technicality or realist considerations; in order to make NATO burden-sharing work, the allies needed to balance three dimensions of collective defence burden: military, economic, and moral.
CITATION STYLE
Kunertova, D. (2017). The Canadian politics of fair-share: The first burden-sharing debates about NATO. Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 15(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794012.2016.1268792
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.