Ponderación y constitución viviente como expresión del mismo fenómeno constitucional: La experiencia AorteAmericana

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The author seeks to demonstrate the hidden connection that exists between balancing and the living constitution. In this respect, accepting balancing as a mechanism of constitutional adjudication assumes the need to conceptualize the Constitution as a living instrument. In effect, balancing requires a model of Constitution flexible and moldable, standard that the living constitution precisely promotes. The article demonstrates this connection by describing the experience of American constitutionalism at the end of the XIX century and the beginning of the XX century. Finally, the author points out the tensions that the binomial balancing-living constitution introduces within the traditional framework of constitutionalism.

References Powered by Scopus

Proportionality: Constitutional rights and their limitations

489Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Ultimate Rule of Law

217Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The idea of socratic contestation and the right to justification: The point of rights-based proportionality review

158Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Legislated rights: Securing human rights through legislation

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rethinking health crisis management

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Living Constitutionalism. Interpretive Method, Semantic Presuppositions and Difficulties

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Falcón, G. C. (2016). Ponderación y constitución viviente como expresión del mismo fenómeno constitucional: La experiencia AorteAmericana. Revista Espanola de Derecho Constitucional, 107, 41–74. https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/redc.107.02

Readers over time

‘18‘20‘23‘2400.511.52

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

50%

Researcher 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0