Assessing the competitiveness of medical humanities research on psychiatry, otolaryngology, and ophthalmology residency program applications

Abstract

Medical humanities research is an increasing area of interest for students as medical schools become more aware of the benefits of humanities and the arts on patient care. However, medical students may feel dissuaded from pursuing medical humanities work for fear of how it will be perceived on their residency applications. In this study, residency program directors (PDs) in New York state in psychiatry, ophthalmology, and otolaryngology were surveyed about their opinions on the competitiveness of students doing medical humanities research applying to their programs. Of the 64 PDs contacted, twenty submitted responses (31.3%). When asked if a residency applicant who only had medical humanities research experience would be seriously considered for their program, 95% of PDs said yes. Furthermore, 65% of PDs said that having medical humanities research experience in addition to clinical research increased a student’s chance of being accepted to their program. Thirty percent of PDs indicated that the medical humanities were an important selection criteria for their program. Qualitative responses emphasized that non-traditional projects, such as personal essays, were as valid as published journal articles when conducted with academic rigor. Many PDs also believed that the medical humanities increased compassion, empathy, and communication skills in their residents. Considering these results, medical students should feel empowered to pursue medical humanities research, even if they are applying into a competitive surgical specialty. It should not diminish their chances of being seriously considered for a program, and may even confer an advantage over their clinical research peers.