Transforming fast and loose arguments into sound scholarly debate: a response to the critique of ‘partial independence beats full independence’

3Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rezvani, D. (2019, July 3). Transforming fast and loose arguments into sound scholarly debate: a response to the critique of ‘partial independence beats full independence.’ Territory, Politics, Governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1567989

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free