Obshchestvennost’ and civic agency in late imperial and Soviet Russia: Interface between state and society

5Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In modernizing Russia, obshchestvennost', an indigenous Russian word, began functioning as an indispensable term to illuminate newly emerging active parts of society and their public identities. This volume approaches various phenomena associated with obshchestvennost' across the revolutionary divide of 1917, targeting a critic and the commercial press in the late Imperial society, workers and the public opinion in the revolutionary turmoil of 1905, the liberals during the first world war, worker-peasant correspondents in the 1920s, community activists in the 1930s, medical professionals under late Stalinism, people's vigilante groups and comrade courts throughout the 1950s–1960s and Soviet dissidents. Furthermore, focusing on obshchestvennost' as a strategic word appealing to active citizens for political goals, this book illustrates how the state elites and counter-elites used this word and sought a new form of state–society relation derived from their visions of progress during the late imperial and Soviet Russia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matsui, Y. (2015). Obshchestvennost’ and civic agency in late imperial and Soviet Russia: Interface between state and society. Obshchestvennost’ and Civic Agency in Late Imperial and Soviet Russia: Interface Between State and Society (pp. 1–234). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137547231

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free