Thinking Intersectionality: Sexualities and the Politics of Multiple Identities

8Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Sexuality studies have been moving toward a research program that emphasizes sexualities as part of the intersectional study of identity categories, such as race, class, and gender for over two decades now (Gamson and Moon, 2004; Taylor, 2007). On one hand, intersectional understandings of sexualities complicate and better capture individuals’ lived experiences. Yet, on the other hand, intersectionality points to a potentially endless process of multiplying identity categories indefinitely. Consequentially, intersectionality can end up recapitulating the same essentialist epistemology of experience framework that constitutes focusing on a single identity category (Clough, 1994; Seidman, 2007). To this end, I explore the benefits and limits of intersectionality for sexuality studies, highlighting my theoretical points with a US-based case study of racial heterosexual masculinities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dean, J. J. (2010). Thinking Intersectionality: Sexualities and the Politics of Multiple Identities. In Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences (pp. 119–139). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230304093_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free