Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants on splicing: Clues from an allelic imbalance study

32Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Nearly one-half of BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence variations are variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) and are candidates for splice alterations for example, by disrupting/creating splice sites. As out-of-frame splicing defects lead to a marked reduction of the level of the mutant mRNA cleared through nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, a cDNA-based test was developed to show the resulting allelic imbalance (AI). Fifty-four VUSs identified in 53 hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) patients without BRCA1/2 mutation were included in the study. Two frequent exonic single-nucleotide polymorphisms on both BRCA1 and BRCA2 were investigated by using a semiquantitative single-nucleotide primer extension approach and the cDNA allelic ratios obtained were corrected using genomic DNA ratios from the same sample. A total of five samples showed AI. Subsequent transcript analyses ruled out the implication of VUS on AI and identified a deletion encompassing BRCA2 exons 12 and 13 in one sample. No sequence abnormality was found in the remaining four samples, suggesting implication of cis- or trans-acting factors in allelic expression regulation that might be disease causative in these HBOC patients. Overall, this study showed that AI screening is a simple way to detect deleterious splicing defects and that a major role for VUSs and deep intronic mutations in splicing anomalies is unlikely in BRCA1/2 genes. Methods to analyze gene expression and identify regulatory elements in BRCA1/2 are now needed to complement standard approaches to mutational analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Caux-Moncoutier, V., Pagès-Berhouet, S., Michaux, D., Asselain, B., Castéra, L., De Pauw, A., … Houdayer, C. (2009). Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants on splicing: Clues from an allelic imbalance study. European Journal of Human Genetics, 17(11), 1471–1480. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2009.89

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free