A comparison of magnesium sulphate and sildenafil in the treatment of the newborns with persistent pulmonary hypertension: A randomized controlled trial

35Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this prospective, randomized and controlled study was to compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate (MgSO 4) and oral sildenafil therapies with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. A total of 34 infants in the MgSO 4 group and 31 infants in the sildenafil group completed the study. The time to reach the adequate clinical response [defined as oxygen index (OI) level of <15, a pulmonary artery pressure of <20 mmHg) was significantly shorter in the sildenafil group (p = 0.002). Duration of mechanical ventilation was longer and the number of the patients requiring inotropic support was higher in the MgSO 4 group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Although among two groups the difference in OI > 5 as speculated in our hypothesis could only be found at 36 h of the treatment, sildenafil was more effective than MgSO 4 in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborns with regard to time to adequate clinical response, duration of mechanical ventilation and support requirement with inotropic agents. © The Author [2010].

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Uslu, S., Kumtepe, S., Bulbul, A., Comert, S., Bolat, F., & Nuhoglu, A. (2011). A comparison of magnesium sulphate and sildenafil in the treatment of the newborns with persistent pulmonary hypertension: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 57(4), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmq091

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free