Digestion and Energy Balance in Lactating Dairy Cows Fed Varying Ratios of Alfalfa Silage and Grain

14Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Forty-four multiparous and 43 primiparous Holstein cows were used to study the effect of dietary alfalfa silage: grain ratio on digestion, passage of digesta, and energy balance in a complete lactation experiment. Cows were placed on one of five treatments with forage contents from 38.2 to 98.2% (DM basis) during the first 12 wk of lactation. Forage content was increased during wk 13 to 26 of lactation to give diets containing 48.2 to 98.2% forage and again during wk 27 to 44 to give diets containing 68.2 to 98.2% forage. Both DMI and DM digestibilities decreased as proportion of dietary forage increased. The DM digestibilities for multiparous and primiparous cows ranged between 69.3 and 57.3% during early lactation and 64.9 and 55.5% during late lactation. Increased percentage of forage in the diet decreased and then increased (quadratic relationship) the ruminal retention time of La, a marker applied to the alfalfa silage in early and late lactation. Time cows spent eating and ruminating per kilogram of DMI increased as proportion of forage in the diet increased. Cows fed diets with a high proportion of alfalfa silage remained in negative energy balance longer than cows fed high grain diets. Intake of NEL (calculated by either of two methods) minus NEL output (milk, maintenance, and BW change) resulted in net balances of NEL after 36 wk of lactation within 5% of NEL intake and indicated that estimates of the NEL value of feedstuffs used in this experiment were reasonably accurate. © 1995, American Dairy Science Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dhiman, T. R., Kleinmans, J., Tessmann, N. J., Radloff, H. D., & Satter, L. D. (1995). Digestion and Energy Balance in Lactating Dairy Cows Fed Varying Ratios of Alfalfa Silage and Grain. Journal of Dairy Science, 78(2), 330–341. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76641-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free