[Failure analysis of medical linear accelerator with reliability analyses]

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We analyzed a number of cases about the Linac troubles in our hospital and have examined the effect of preventive maintenance with Weibull analysis and exponential distribution from April 2001 to March 2012. The total failure by irradiation disabled was 1, 192. (1) Medical linear accelerator (MLC) system was 24.0%, (2) radiation dosimetry system 13.1%, and the (3) cooling-water system was 26.5%. It accounts for 63.6% of the total number of failures. Each parameter value m, which means the shape parameter, and the failure period expectancy of parts μ were (1) 1.21, 1.46/3.9, 3.8 years. 3.7, 3.6 years. (2) 2.84, 1.59/6.6, 4.3 years. 6.7, 5.9 years. (3) 5.12, 4.16/6.1, 8.5 years. 6.1, 8.5 years. Each shape parameter was m>1. It is believed that they are in the worn-out failure period. To prevent failure, MLC performance should be overhauled once every 3 years and a cooling unit should be overhauled once every 7 years. Preventive maintenance is useful in assessing the failure of radiation therapy equipment. In a radiation dosimetry part, you can make a preemptive move before the failure by changing the monitor's dosimeter board with a new part from the repairs stockpiled every 6 months for maintenance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zakimi, K., Watanabe, H., Ishida, H., Take, T., Kato, M., Iwai, T., … Nakazawa, Y. (2014). [Failure analysis of medical linear accelerator with reliability analyses]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi, 70(12), 1445–1454. https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2014_JSRT_70.12.1445

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free