An Autoethnography of Hybrid IR Scholars: De-Territorializing the Global IR Debate

Abstract

Who can speak from the perspective of the Global South? In answering this question, Global International Relations (IR) finds itself in a cul de sac : rather than globalize IR, Global IR essentializes non-Western categories by associating difference and knowledge to place (countries, regions, and civilizations) which occludes de-territorialized forms of knowledge pro- duction. To reach out for these forms of knowledge, we develop the con- cept of "hybrid subjectivity,"and propose a shift from the macro to the micro. We propose autoethnography as a method to proceed with this move and present two case studies based on our experiences as hybrid IR scholars to illustrate it. In doing so, we demonstrate the relevance of our self-reflexive exercise in deconstructing reified categories and render- ing visible new forms of knowledge in the Global IR debate. This article's conceptualization of hybrid subjectivity enables the recasting of Global IR in a relational, hybrid, and truly global framework for analysis. The argu- ment goes beyond the confines of Global IR and adds essential analytical value to critical, decolonial, and pluriversal critiques of wester-centrism in IR; in the sense of opening new theoretical and empirical possibilities, as an alternative to current intellectual efforts to recover non-colonial or pre- colonial forms of non-Western authenticity.