Teaching logic in philosophy

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Logic considered as a general model of reasoning is equated in most cases with argumentation. The symbolic component of logic is the main component of the teaching of the subject, even in a first course in Philosophy, but for students with poor technical skills, formal logic is not the best way to enhance their thinking and their initiation to the inquiry. To improve their reasoning, it would be better to begin with different problem solving tasks in natural language and only after their resolution should we try to symbolize them. Moreover, argumentation and reasoning are related but they aren't the same thing. In argumentation the linguistic and social components can't be forgotten. Training in argumentation is left to logic or never taught. Students' argumentative skills should be developed in parallel both in oral discussions and by writing. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carrascal, B. (2011). Teaching logic in philosophy. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6680 LNAI, pp. 38–45). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21350-2_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free