Spatial information revision: A comparison between 3 approaches

8Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The present paper deals with spatial information revision in geographical information system (GIS). These systems use incomplete and uncertain information and inconsistency can result, therefore the definition of revision operations is required. Most of the proposed belief revision operations are characterized by a high complexity and since GIS use large amount of data, adjustments of existing strategies are necessary. Taking advantage of the specificity of spatial information allows to define heuristics which speed up the general algorithms. We illustrate some suitable adjustments on 3 approaches of revision: Binary decision diagrams, preferred models and Reiter's algorithm for diagnostic. We formally compare them and we experiment them on a real application. In order to deal with huge amount of data we propose a divide and revise strategy in the case where inconsistencies are local.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Würbel, É., Jeansoulin, R., & Papini, O. (2001). Spatial information revision: A comparison between 3 approaches. In Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science) (Vol. 2143, pp. 454–465). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44652-4_40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free