Perineostomy: The last oportunity

8Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To review the technique and outcome of perineal urethrostomy or urethral perineostomy and to identify factors related to the procedure failure. Material and methods: We studied 17 patients who underwent perineal urethrostomybetween 2009-2013 in a single hospital. Success was defined as no need for additional surgical treatment or urethral dilatation. We reviewed the clinical data related to age, weight, previous urethral surgery, diabetes, hypertension, ischemic cardiopathy, lichen sclerosus and other causes and studied their association with the procedure failure (univariate analysis). We completed the analysis with a multivariate test based on binary regression. Results: The average follow-up was 39.41 months. From all the causes, we found Lichen Sclerosus in 35%, idiopathic etiology in 29% and prior hypospadia repair in 18%. Postoperative failure occurred in 3 patients, with a final success of 82.4%. The binary regression model showed as independent risk factors ischemic cardiopathy (OR: 2.34), and the presence of Lichen Sclerosis (OR: 3.21). Conclusions: The success rate with the perineal urethrostomy technique shows it to be a valid option above all when we preserve the urethral blood supply and plate. Lichen sclerosus and ischemic vascular problems are risk factors to re-stenosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Regueiro López, J. C., Gomez, E. G., Carrillo, A. A., Castiñeira, R. C., & Tapia, M. J. R. (2015). Perineostomy: The last oportunity. International Braz J Urol, 41(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free