Can a significance test be genuinely bayesian?

76Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Full Bayesian Significance Test, FBST, is extensively reviewed. Its test statistic, a genuine Bayesian measure of evidence, is discussed in detail. Its behavior in some problems of statistical inference like testing for independence in contingency tables is discussed. © 2008 International Society for Bayesian Analysis.

References Powered by Scopus

Bayes factors

12828Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bayesian Theory

3785Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages

3174Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Analysis of Bayesian posterior significance and effect size indices for the two-sample t-test to support reproducible medical research

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bayesian and frequentist testing for differences between two groups with parametric and nonparametric two-sample tests

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Trophic and limnological changes in highly fragmented rivers predict the decreasing abundance of detritivorous fish

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pereira, C. A. D. B., Stern, J. M., & Wechsler, S. (2008). Can a significance test be genuinely bayesian? Bayesian Analysis, 3(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-BA303

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

49%

Researcher 10

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 8

31%

Mathematics 8

31%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

19%

Psychology 5

19%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free