Skip to main content
Conference ProceedingsOPEN ACCESS

Twitter Sentiment Analysis: The Good the Bad and the OMG!

Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2011 (2011) 538-541
DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14185
883Citations
Citations of this article
1.5kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the utility of linguistic features for detecting the sentiment of Twitter messages. We evaluate the usefulness of existing lexical resources as well as features that capture information about the informal and creative language used in microblogging. We take a supervised approach to the problem, but leverage existing hashtags in the Twitter data for building training data.

References Powered by Scopus

Opinion mining and sentiment analysis

Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval
7099Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

BoosTexter: a boosting-based system for text categorization

Machine Learning
1922Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
1605Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
View more at Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sentiment analysis and opinion mining

Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies
3733Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: Tasks, approaches and applications

Knowledge-Based Systems
1074Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning sentiment-specific word embedding for twitter sentiment classification

52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2014 - Proceedings of the Conference
1061Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text
View more at Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., & Moore, J. (2011). Twitter Sentiment Analysis: The Good the Bad and the OMG! In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2011 (pp. 538–541). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14185

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 761

78%

Researcher 89

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 65

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 58

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 730

74%

Social Sciences 109

11%

Engineering 75

8%

Business, Management and Accounting 71

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free