Implementing depression care in under-resourced communities: a school-based family resilience skill-building pilot randomized controlled trial in the United States

1Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Youth in under-resourced communities are more likely to have greater social risk factors for mental health needs yet have less access to needed care. School-based mental health services are effective in treating common disorders such as adolescent depression; however, few have a family-centered approach, which may especially benefit specific populations. Methods: Utilizing a community-partnered approach, we adapted an established, trauma-informed, resilience skill-building family intervention for adolescents with depression. We conducted a small randomized controlled feasibility pilot of an adapted intervention in a large school district that serves predominately low-income, Latinx students in the Southwest United States between 2014-2017. Youth between the ages of 12-18 years old with a Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) score of 10 or higher, who spoke English or Spanish, were recruited from 12 school mental health clinics. Twenty-five eligible adolescents with depression and their participating caregivers were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either the adapted intervention, Families OverComing Under Stress for Families with Adolescent Depression (FOCUS-AD), or usual care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) only. Most of the sample was Latinx and female. We evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness. Results: Among participants who completed standardized assessments administered at baseline and approximately five months post-randomization (n = 10 FOCUS-AD, n = 11 CBT only), effectiveness was explored by identifying significant changes over time in adolescent mental health within the FOCUS-AD and CBT only groups and comparing the magnitude of these changes between groups. Nonparametric statistical tests were used. We found the FOCUS-AD intervention to be feasible and acceptable; participant retention was high. Adolescent symptoms of depression (measured by the PHQ-8) improved significantly from baseline to follow-up for youth in both FOCUS-AD (median decrease [MD] = 10, p = 0.02) and control (MD = 6, p = 0.01) groups, with no significant difference across the two groups. Results were similar for symptoms of PTSD (measured by the Child PTSD Symptom Scale; FOCUS-AD MD = 12.5, p = 0.01; CBT only MD = 7, p = 0.04; no significant difference between groups). Conclusion: Family-centered approaches to depression treatment among adolescents living in under-resourced communities may lead to improved mental health, although further research is warranted.

References Powered by Scopus

The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure

32069Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing Coping Strategies: A Theoretically Based Approach

8090Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider the brief COPE

5365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The relationship between family communication and family resilience in Chinese parents of depressed adolescents: a serial multiple mediation of social support and psychological resilience

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marlotte, L., Klomhaus, A., Ijadi-Maghsoodi, R., Aralis, H., Lester, P., Griffin Esperon, K., & Kataoka, S. (2023). Implementing depression care in under-resourced communities: a school-based family resilience skill-building pilot randomized controlled trial in the United States. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1233901

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

46%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

23%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 5

42%

Psychology 4

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

17%

Social Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0