The discourse motivation for split-ergative alignment in Dutch nominalisations (and elsewhere)

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Dutch nominalisations of the type het eten van vlees (‘the eating of meat’) have ergative alignment. The alignment is functionally motivated, in that it is a natural consequence of the flow of discourse. The functional account that is put forward here draws on the notion of Preferred Argument Structure (Du Bois 1987) and on the distinction between foregrounded and backgrounded discourse (Hopper & Thompson 1980). Support for this account comes from other domains of ergativity in Dutch, such as causativised predicates and participial constructions and from the observation that the alignment in Dutch nominalisations is in fact split-ergative. The present study adduces corpus evidence to corroborate the claims. In the last section, the analysis is cast in a Functional Discourse Grammar model (Hengeveld & Mackenzie 2008), including its hitherto underdescribed Contextual Component.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van de Velde, F. (2014). The discourse motivation for split-ergative alignment in Dutch nominalisations (and elsewhere). Pragmatics, 24(2), 317–348. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.2.07vel

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free