Aims: Description of a clinical case addressed by using a bioethical focus. Materials and methods: Relevant facts were clarified and moral problems were identified by moral deliberation; main ethical problem was selected and courses of action were suggested. Results and conclusions: In this clinical case the most prudent solution was justified paternalism. The practice of moral deliberation is essential since decisions frequently surpass medical techniques and demand the deliberation of moral values.
CITATION STYLE
Espínola-Nadurille, M., Sánchez-Barroso, J. A., Páez-Moreno, R., Sánchez-Guzmán, M. A., & Ramírez-Bermúdez, J. (2014). Falta de sentido de vida y suicidio: ¿En qué circunstancias el paternalismo médico puede estar justificado? Acta Bioethica, 20(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2014000100005
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.