Understanding Co-Design Practice as a Process of “Welldoing”

2Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Co-design and other associated design approaches often deploy creative and making approaches in facilitating collaborative practices. In a therapeutic setting, engagement in creative and making activities have been associated with improvements in people's well-being, yet when deploying these as part of co-design practices, these outcomes are often overlooked. This paper presents the results from a series of workshops that focused on the well-being benefits of participating in co-design practices. The research uses Max-Neef's (1991). Theory of Needs to explore how innate human needs might be satisfied through participation in co-design practices, and demonstrates how this framework might be used for planning and evaluating co-design practices through a wellbeing lens. Finally, it suggests that future generations of design practitioners would benefit from exposure to the consideration of co-design as a process of “welldoing.”.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davis, A., Tuckey, M., Gwilt, I., & Wallace, N. (2023). Understanding Co-Design Practice as a Process of “Welldoing.” International Journal of Art and Design Education, 42(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12459

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Researcher 4

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Design 7

50%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

21%

Arts and Humanities 3

21%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0