Toward full, multiple, and optimal wood fibre utilization: A modeling perspective

10Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The slow growth rates of Canada's considerable forest fibre supply give it exceptional characteristics. It is a challenge for forest managers, researchers, and stakeholders to realize the highest value creation from this opportunity for the benefit of Canadians. Ideally, this should be achieved with full, multiple, and optimal wood fibre utilization, whereby all quality classes of wood fibre are used to their fullest potential, and all possible value creation options are considered. This paper describes the concept of value chains in a global context, and how they can be applied to forestry using a modeling framework. This is followed by a discussion on how this modeling framework can be used to address the optimal use of wood fibre, and how it can be used to address forest management-related issues and concerns.

References Powered by Scopus

The governance of global value chains

4722Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Upstream or downstream in the value chain?

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of spatially explicit forest landscape fire disturbance models

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assessing forest biomass for bioenergy: Operational challenges and cost considerations

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Forest Productivity Enhancement and Compensatory Growth: A Review and Synthesis

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ecosite-based predictive modeling of black spruce (Picea mariana) wood quality attributes in boreal Ontario

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, C. (2009). Toward full, multiple, and optimal wood fibre utilization: A modeling perspective. Forestry Chronicle, 85(3), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc85377-3

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘15‘17‘21‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

40%

Materials Science 1

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

20%

Environmental Science 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0