Validity and Enforceability of Customary Law in Nigeria: Towards a Correct Delimitation of the Province of the Courts

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

With a view to showing that courts do not have the power to validate native law and custom, this article highlights the different roles assigned to the assent of the people governed by native law and custom, and to the court called upon to determine its judicial enforceability. It argues that customary law is validated by the assent of the people and not by courts, and that the tests contained in different statutes by which courts are permitted to intervene in the regime of customary law are tests of enforceability and not tests of validity. As a result, it argues that the term "validity test" is misleading when used in relation to the power of courts to determine the enforceability of native law and custom, and should therefore be discarded.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Enabulele, A. O., & Bazuaye, B. (2019). Validity and Enforceability of Customary Law in Nigeria: Towards a Correct Delimitation of the Province of the Courts. Journal of African Law, 63(1), 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185531800030X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free