Model selection under covariate shift

12Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A common assumption in supervised learning is that the training and test input points follow the same probability distribution. However, this assumption is not fulfilled, e.g., in interpolation, extrapolation, or active learning scenarios. The violation of this assumption-known as the covariate shift-causes a heavy bias in standard generalization error estimation schemes such as cross-validation and thus they result in poor model selection. In this paper, we therefore propose an alternative estimator of the generalization error. Under covariate shift, the proposed generalization error estimator is unbiased if the learning target function is included in the model at hand and it is asymptotically unbiased in general. Experimental results show that model selection with the proposed generalization error estimator is compared favorably to cross-validation in extrapolation. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

References Powered by Scopus

Improving predictive inference under covariate shift by weighting the log-likelihood function

1367Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Review of Domain Adaptation without Target Labels

373Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guiding new physics searches with unsupervised learning

90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Making generative classifiers robust to selection bias

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sugiyama, M., & Müller, K. R. (2005). Model selection under covariate shift. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3697 LNCS, pp. 235–240). https://doi.org/10.1007/11550907_37

Readers over time

‘10‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘21‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

72%

Researcher 5

28%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 14

74%

Engineering 3

16%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

5%

Social Sciences 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0