Governing the freshwater commons: Lessons from application of the Trilogy of Governance tools in Australia and the Western United States

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Common pool resources, by definition, are difficult to govern. The governance of water as a common pool resource is even more complex because of its unique physical characteristics, our special relation to it, and its necessity for life. Western societies have developed three approaches to governance of common pool resources: (1) government regulation; (2) the division of the resource into private property; and (3) self-organisation involving both governmental and nongovernmental actors. This chapter asserts that the unique nature of water requires the availability of all three approaches for use in combination if society is to rise to the challenge presented by the impact of growing population and climate change on water supply and demand. Long-term drought provides a window on potential future climate scenarios. In the face of long-term drought, Australia and the western United States have responded through innovation in water governance. This provides an opportunity for comparative analysis of reform to begin to understand the combination of governance approaches that lead to greater adaptive capacity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cosens, B. (2018). Governing the freshwater commons: Lessons from application of the Trilogy of Governance tools in Australia and the Western United States. In Reforming Water Law and Governance: From Stagnation to Innovation in Australia (pp. 281–298). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8977-0_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free