The effects of oral arginine on its metabolic pathways in Sprague–Dawley rats

10Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Oral arginine supplements are popular mainly for their presumed vasodilatory benefit. Arginine is a substrate for at least four enzymes including nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and arginase, but the impact of oral supplements on its different metabolic pathways is not clear. Deficiencies of arginine-metabolising enzymes are associated with conditions such as hyperammonaemia, endothelial dysfunction, central nervous system and muscle dysfunction, which complicate the use of oral arginine supplements. We examined the effect of L-arginine (L-Arg) and D-arginine (D-Arg), each at 500 mg/kg per d in drinking water administered for 4 weeks to separate groups of 9-week-old male Sprague–Dawley rats. We quantified the expression of enzymes and plasma, urine and organ levels of various metabolites of arginine. L-Arg significantly decreased cationic transporter-1 expression in the liver and the ileum and increased endothelial NOS expression in the aorta and the kidney and plasma nitrite levels, but did not affect the mean arterial pressure. L-Arg also decreased the expression of arginase II in the ileum, arginine:glycine amidinotransferase in the liver and the kidney and glyoxalase I in the liver, ileum and brain, but increased the expression of arginine decarboxylase and polyamines levels in the liver. D-Arg, the supposedly inert isomer, also unexpectedly affected the expression of some enzymes and metabolites. In conclusion, both L- and D-Arg significantly affected enzymes and metabolites in several pathways that use arginine as a substrate and further studies with different doses and treatment durations are planned to establish their safety or adverse effects to guide their use as oral supplements.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin, S., & Desai, K. (2020). The effects of oral arginine on its metabolic pathways in Sprague–Dawley rats. British Journal of Nutrition, 123(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114519002691

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free