Root length and alveolar bone level of impacted canines and adjacent teeth after orthodontic traction: A long-term evaluation

26Citations
Citations of this article
153Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long¬term effects of orthodontic traction on root length and alveolar bone level in impacted canines and adjacent teeth. Material and Methods: Sample consisted of 16 patients (nine males and seven females), mean initial age 11 years and 8 months presenting with unilaterally maxillary impacted canines, palatally displaced, treated with the same surgical and orthodontic approach. Teeth from the impacted-canine side were assigned as Group I (GI), and contralateral teeth as control, Group II (GII). The mean age of patients at the end of orthodontic treatment was 14 years and 2 months and the mean post-treatment time was 5 years and 11 months. Both contralateral erupted maxillary canines and adjacent teeth served as control. Root length and alveolar bone level (buccal and palatal) were evaluated on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. The comparison of root length and alveolar bone level changes between groups were assessed by applying paired t-test, at a significance level of 5% (p<0.05). Results: There were no statistically significant differences in root length and buccal and palatal bone levels of canines and adjacent teeth among groups. Conclusions: Impacted canine treatment by closed-eruption technique associated with canine crown perforation, has a minimal effect on root length and buccal and palatal alveolar bone level in both canine and adjacent teeth, demonstrating that this treatment protocol has a good long-term prognosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Da Silva, A. C., Capistrano, A., De Almeida-Pedrin, R. R., Cardoso, M. D. A., Conti, A. C. D. C. F., & Capelozza Filho, L. (2017). Root length and alveolar bone level of impacted canines and adjacent teeth after orthodontic traction: A long-term evaluation. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 25(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-77572016-0133

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free