Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes after Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

6Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective. This study aimed to investigate the factors related to pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy. Methods. A retrospective review was conducted on 156 patients aged 18 to 45 years who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy in Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital from January 2010 to December 2016. Follow-up medical records and information were collected on demographic variables, clinical variables, and postoperative pregnancy rate. The logistic regression model was used to assess the association between related factors and postoperative pregnancy rate or pregnancy outcome. The outcome indicators included abortion=0, premature birth=1, and full term=2. The chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was used to compare the differences in pregnancy outcomes, postpartum hemorrhage, and placenta adhesion between the cohorts. Results. The size of fibroids correlated with the postoperative pregnancy rate. The larger the fibroids, the lower the postoperative pregnancy rate, and the difference was statistically significant. The number of fibroids and placental adhesions was positively associated with postoperative pregnancy; the higher the number of fibroids, the higher the incidence of placental adhesions. However, the postoperative interval of pregnancy, fibroid size, and number and type of fibroids are not correlated with the pregnancy outcomes of postoperative patients. Conclusions. The size of myoma may influence the pregnancy rate of patients after laparoscopic myomectomy. The number of fibroids can affect the incidence of placental adhesions during postoperative pregnancy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lu, B., Wang, Q., Yan, L., Yu, K., & Cai, Y. (2022). Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes after Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9685585

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free