Constitutive model error and uncertainty quantification

  • Franck I
  • Koutsourelakis P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel Bayesian strategy for high‐dimensional inverse problems in the context of elastostatics. Apart from parametric uncertainties, model inadequacies and, particularly, constitutive model errors, are also addressed. This is especially important in biomedical settings when the inferred material properties will be used to make decisions/diagnoses. Traditional approaches use an additional regression model (e.g., Gaussian process), added to the model output or within a submodel to account, for an underlying model error. This can violate physical constraints and becomes impractical in high dimensions.In this work we unfold conservation and constitutive laws to estimate model discrepancies. In addition, efficient Bayesian strategies are employed. In elastography, the accurate identification of the unknown mechanical properties of a tissue as well as the associated uncertainty, can greatly assist noninvasive, medical diagnosis. (© 2017 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Franck, I. M., & Koutsourelakis, P. S. (2017). Constitutive model error and uncertainty quantification. PAMM, 17(1), 865–868. https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.201710400

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free